THE TALK SHOW

Host: Glenn Guzzo

 

You can submit your question or insight on any Strat-O-Matic game to SOMTalkShow@aol.com. When you do, kindly include your name and town. Other gamers like to see that. And the display format below works better that way.

 

 

Reminder: Send us your “Great Moments in Strat” – your playing experiences that you just have to share.

 

 

If You Love to Watch …

 

I saw the cool new feature for NetPlay spectators in football.  Will this be a feature added to other leagues as well?  I think it is awesome.  Great job.  You guys have really done a wonder with the innovations this year in different sports.

 

            Yes, this should be cool, especially for leagues. Typically, when a new computer feature in one Strat-O-Matic becomes popular, the game company tries to add it to its other computer games as well. However, Bob Winberry says “Unfortunately, this feature would be very hard to add to the other games.  Football was unique because Netplay was part of the original design of the product.  This made adding this feature a bit easier.  For the other three sports, Netplay was grafted onto the existing code as opposed to being an integral part of the initial design.  That makes it much more difficult to add Spectator mode to those games.  When we add Netplay support to the skinned version of the baseball program (either this year or sometime in the future) we will do so  keeping Spectator mode in mind.  That will lay the groundwork so that Spectator Mode can be added to the baseball game at a future date.”

 

The Best Hockey Set Yet

I played the new computer version of STRAT Hockey today for the first time, utilizing the Goldberg Passing system.  I have to say that the passing system, along with the statistical tweaks have made this game perfect.  I may be off about this, but it seems like even more consideration has been given to a player’s teammates and other factors when putting his card together?  Regardless, the playability of the game is unmatched in a positive way compared to any other point in the game’s history.  Congrats on a job VERY well done.

 Barry, Bronx, New York

           

I agree with you, Barry. I don’t know that more consideration has been given to the influence of teammates, but you can sure see that the influence is meaningful. Some hockey gamers look only at the scoring chances and fail to understand why a forward can have a scoring card nearly as strong as another player with 10-15 more goals. Before concluding that something is amiss, it’s important to look at all the ways a player gets his shots:

 

n Higher Offense and Breakaway/Penetration ratings earn more shots from the split deck and the “Any Player” options.

n  Higher defense ratings earn more shot-producing takeaways. At defense 3 or higher, some of those shots are Inside shots.

n  Better J-K-L passing from linemates produce Inside Shots instead of no shot at all.

n  If a forward is likely to be playing with his team’s No. 1 defensive pair most of the game, that can be a huge benefit in the passing columns. The drop-off in J-K-L passing from the first defensive pair to the next often is substantial.

 

Time Well Spent

First let me express my gratitude for taking up so much of my time since 1972. Dad taught me the baseball and football games when I was 10 years old and card arrival day has remained a special day all these years. I know the pressure is on, and I’ll get slammed for suggesting it, but perhaps we could all feel that holiday spirit again if we did not get advance reviews of the cards/ratings.

While it’s human nature to question the cards from time to time, let me be clear that I do not care. If used realistically, more often than not things will work out close to how they should. The fact is there will always be the element of luck as long as random factors like dice are involved. No way around it and it works just fine.

At 46 years of age, I am still a cards-and-dice player and do not anticipate switching to the computer version. I am certain they are fine and have several friends who like them. Personally I prefer the feel of the dice in my hand, if for no other reason than to throw them across the room when the player fails to do as expected. Of course this happened so often from day one that I soon tired of walking to the end of a room to retrieve the dice. But … the option remains.

I am now involved with a football keeper league entering its 18th season and going strong.  I hope to do this for at least another 18 and more. The eight of us do play the baseball game on a more occasional basis and without the same intensity. Usually we do it for therapy. I replay the full season for the Mets combining solo and whoever stops by.

Again, thanks for the 30+ years and keep doing exactly what you do.

Jeff Konstant, Elkton, VA

Very nicely said, Jeff. Many of us can feel your joy.

Yes, the advance info on card ratings is a bit like knowing what you are getting for Christmas weeks before the big day. But for every several who lament this each year, many more crave it. In the days of STRAT FAN, and before that, the Strat-O-Matic Review, the card-ratings issue was the most sought-after of the year. Most of this demand comes from gamers in competitive leagues and STAR tournaments. Some is from the “just-can’t-wait” crowd. And yet, just like the Christmas present you really, really want, the new cards and computer disks are a thrill to behold the day we unwrap them. That’s why hundreds line up outside Strat-O-Matic on Opening Day and thousands more post lookouts waiting for the big brown truck.

Everything you said about the cards-and-dice version is true. Nothing tops the experience of rolling the dice and engaging in the chatter with an opponent in head-to-head play. That’s the STAR tournament experience. And as great as head-to-head play is for baseball, it’s even more intense in Strat-O-Matic football. This is why NetPlay was such a breakthrough with the SOM computer games. The new features for computer football – spectator mode and the Strat-O-Matic Gaming Lobby – should multiply that excitement.

Ripken Will Improve Third Base Stock in HOF Set

 

No other third sackers close to enshrinement? What about Cal Ripken this year?  He played both shortstop and third base. 

Bill Donnelly, Indio, CA

 

All of Ripken’s best seasons were at shortstop, and it will be a waste not to have his plus offense there. But with the paucity of regular third-basemen in the Hall of Fame, an update edition with Ripken probably will result in him playing there. As it stands, middle infielders Billy Herman, Tony Lazzeri and Joe Sewell end up playing third. So does Pete Rose, who was a much better outfielder than third baseman. And so does Jackie Robinson, who played third base less than any of his other carded positions.

 

Speaking of Third Basemen

Is it possible to see the 1980 George Brett card?

 

Comparing Pitchers

 

When you are evaluating pitchers, what specific stats or numbers from the ratings do you focus on? Which categories do you add up or evaluate when comparing pitchers?

Teun Fetz

 

            I begin by adding on-base chances and total base chances. Don’t forget that the difference between an e0 and an e51 is worth a couple on-base chances and a couple of total base chances. Ballpark diamonds matter a lot. But I’m also looking at other ratings that work in combination with card chances. If a pitcher is wild, has a poor hold rating and a high wild pitch rating, that’s a combination that will deny him many double-play opportunities. I’m definitely looking at the pitcher’s double-play chances, especially if he’s in a ballpark with high single chances.

 

 

Dodger Diehard Trades Koufax – and Wins

Harold Richman was kind enough to autograph my copy of your book.  I believe his gesture was because of my long tenure with his company, having first purchased his game in 1963.  I have been hooked ever since. Your fine writing truly captured the passion with which we “fanatics” pursue our fantasies and sports dreams through the amazing features and details that empower us in the SOM fantasy world.  You excel at your craft, and you really bring the joy of this game to the people.

            I play in a wonderful SOM baseball retro league called GARBO.   It starts with the 1955 season, and will continue indefinitely. The commissioner screened applicants for their passion for the team/city they would be selecting.  My credentials as a Dodger fan won out. My dad spent a lot of time in New York in the ‘30s and ‘40s, and although I was born in Connecticut, I moved to LA when I was 3 years old.  However, growing up in the ‘50s, Dad always spoke of those legendary Dodgers.   I fell in love with them 3,000 miles away.   When they moved to LA in 1958, my dad took me to see them at the Coliseum the first week they were in town.  The Dodgers have been my sports passion ever since.

            The Chicago Cubs owner in GARBO quickly realized he was going to have to be in a “building mode” for a few years.  I quickly realized this, and noticed an opportunity for each of us to get our wish.  I have always loved the attitude and abilities of Ernie (“Let’s Play Two”) Banks, and he certainly would be an immense upgrade at SS from Pee Wee Reese.   I also knew playing in Ebbets Field would be great for Ernie, so I constructed the ultimate deal.  Since Sandy Koufax was not going to develop into the “greatest pitcher of my time” until 1960/61, this exchange would be beneficial for both of us.  Koufax for Banks happened.

            I batted Banks 3rd all season. I won the NL, and the Yankees (oh, shock of shocks) won the AL.  Ernie had 68 homers and 182 RBI. He was MVP in the World Series, and the Dodgers won it all in six games. During the season, Banks had a game where he hit 4 HRs and a DOUBLE.   It was a remarkable game, in a remarkable season, and maybe the most perfect trade ever.

I am celebrating my 60th birthday and I know I am among the oldest SOM Fanatics on the planet.  Thanks for the memories.

Dave Siemienski     

Ahh, the memories. As a Reds fan, I can’t say I share your affection for the real Dodgers, but that’s quite some run the real Brooklyn/LA teams had from 1946-66. In addition to 10 pennants, they were runners-up seven times, including playoff losses in 1946, 1951 and 1962 and a final-day loss in 1950. The ’55 Dodgers had one of the strongest lineups ever.

I can relate to starting with Strat-O-Matic in 1963, which was my first year (the 1962-season card set). And I can relate to making a trade for Ernie Banks in his prime. When I traded SS Woodie Held, a No. 4 starting pitcher and a fourth outfielder for Banks, that sealed the pennant for my team in a 1959 draft league. Though Banks was league MVP for me, too, he wasn’t in the class of your 68-HR, 182-RBI man.

I’m pleased you enjoyed the Strat-O-Matic Fanatics book. Thanks to support from fanatics like you, the book is now in its second printing.

 

Help Wanted for “Last Minute of Play in This Period”

 

For years I played the most realistic football game on the market (SOM) only to get down to the last 2 minutes of a tight game and have a totally unrealistic finish due to the timing rules. Finally the “tic clock” rule was added which was much more realistic. Every year I hope to see this improvement to basketball and hockey. It seems to be a glaring omission that could easily be addressed. What do you think? I am glad to see Judy Goldberg’s passing system added this year and bet that she has a realistic “tic clock” idea for that last minute when the goalie heads to the bench.

 

Mike, Arizona

 

          The hockey game can end abruptly when the last action card or two has a result such as “Lose to Opponent.” But remember that each action card represents 40 seconds of play and the reading is the key result of what was like several sequences of action. In an NHL game, 40 seconds is a full shift. Since it takes only about 9 seconds for a team to move the puck from behind its own net the length of the ice and get off a shot, a lot can happen in 40 seconds. A lot can happen in a one-action-card sequence of Strat-O-Matic hockey, too.

 

Gamers have many hockey innovations, but I don’t recall seeing an elaborate tic-tock innovation for the final minute of the game. For any number of ideas, however, check out these playing tips from Goldberg, Rob Gallamore, Kent Lundahl, Gord Franklin, John McTernan and others:

 

http://members.shaw.ca/wgallamore/strathockeyrules.htm

 

Return to the Tinker Shop

 

This is in response to the Tinker’s Shop issue with the gb()b with a runner

of third and the infield in.  We have addressed this in our face-to-face league in the following way:

 

    a.    With a runner on third with less than 2 outs, the offensive manager has the option of holding the runner if the defense is playing in.  The runner is not out on a GB(b); instead read as batter out, runner at third holds.  The penalty is that the runner does not

score on a SINGLE*.

 

   b.      The offensive manager must announce the runner on third is not going on contact before rolling.    For the purpose of this rule, we assume a SINGLE* is a ball that was knocked down by an infielder allowing the batter to reach.   However, since the runner on third was not going on contact, he can not score.

Tom Pierson, Boston

I like this. If your penalty applies to all the SI* results on split chances and ballpark-single chances, the tradeoff is significant enough to make the manager think twice about playing it safe. The tradeoff needs to be significant. When any strategy option becomes automatic, there’s not much strategy involved.

Missing in Action

I started to replay the 1930 MLB season on computer, when I noticed the Detroit Tigers had less than 400 AB at the Catcher position.  So I did some digging, and there seems to be a number of players who had a decent amount of time on two squads.  I did not include the trade of Hall of Famers, Goslin for Manush. 

How can I have the players play the correct number of games, or close to it, for each squad?  I attempted to make a trade that occurred during the season, only to be rejected by HAL.  I assumed that when I bought the 1930 season “as played,” it would automatically take care of the trades for me.  Below are examples of players and the team they were traded from with their stats on that team before the trade.  The team they were traded to is in parentheses, and on the computer that team has the full season stats for that player.

Detroit

Bob Fothergill:  55 games, 143 AB  OF  (CHW)

Pink Hargrave: 55 games, 137 AB  C  (WSH)

Harry Rice: 37 games, 128 AB  INF/OF  (NYY)

 

New York Yankees

Mark Koenig: 21 games, 74 AB  INF/OF (Det)

 

Cincinnati

George Kelly: 51 games, 188 AB  1B  (CHC)

Hughie Critz: 28 games, 104 AB  2B  (NYG)

Ethan Allen: 21 games, 46 AB  OF  (NYG)

 

New York Giants

Pat Crawford: 25 games, 76 AB  INF  (CIN)

 

Any help is appreciated.

 Henry Roman  New Egypt, NJ

            When you install a roster file “as played” it should move the players to their correct teams the day of the move. I’m not sure why these traded players would open your season on the rosters of the teams they played for last. I do know that for seasons older than the mid-1980s, the as-played feature often determines roster moves by the dates of games players started, rather than the actual transaction date. I know this because I track transactions closely for the Baseball Replay Guides I produce.

 

            Unfortunately, I know of no source for 1930 Opening Day rosters. But I have these dates for the moves that sent the players above to different teams:

 

Fothergill: from DEA to CHA on July 18

Hargrave: from DEA to WAA on Sep 10

Rice: from DEA to NYA on May 30 ... Koenig from NYA to DEA same date

 

Goslin: from WAA to SLA on June 13 ... Manush from SLA to WAA same date

 

Critz from CIN to NYN on May 21

Crawford from NYN to CIN on May 27

 

            If anyone wants more info about purchasing my Baseball Replay Guides, email me at somtalkshow@aol.com.         

 

 

Sudden Death for the Canadiens

 

I have been impressed over the years with the quality of your baseball products, but none of your products impresses me more than Strat hockey. I think it is simply amazing. Of course, I still prefer the cards and dice. It has a certain charm and quality that, in my view, the computer doesn’t possess. I have put together an eight-team league of 100-point teams and, so far, I have enjoyed it immensely. The eight teams are as follows: 77 Montreal, perhaps the greatest team of all time; 71 Boston, maybe the best team in franchise history; 96 Pittsburgh, the most explosive of all Mario Lemieux-led teams; 80 Philadelphia, with that 35-game unbeaten streak; 02 Detroit, one of the best in franchise history; 01 Colorado, the best team in that franchise’s history, 75 Los Angeles, definitely the best in that team’s history (sorry, Wayne); and 07 Anaheim, the best team last season.

 

I have a standard set of action cards, with a little tweaking to reflect a home-ice advantage, which seems to work out pretty well.   The most memorable moment was in a game between the Kings and the powerful Canadiens. This particular LA team seems to be one of those teams that are always hanging around. Dan Maloney scored the tying goal with only seconds left and then won it in overtime off of the last action card on a SHORT-HANDED outside shot. I have played four games for each, and many have been very good, but this one was the best.                               

J. Cost, Wellsburg, WV  

 

            I will be very interested to see who wins this league. I won’t be surprised if it’s Boston. The depth on the ’77 Canadiens and ’02 Red Wings is amazing, but depth often means less in a league of great teams, where every team has stars who can dominate the best second-tier players. The ’75 Kings have fine depth, too, but maybe not enough star power to contend in this group.

 

 

They’ve Got Those No No-Hitter Blues

 

I will add my lament to those of Scott Dicken and others who may be responding to his note about the lack of a no-hitter. I started playing SOM in 1968 and, through seasons of varying duration, through replays and Old-Timer teams, I’m still waiting. (Carl Hubbell taking one to the ninth is the only time I’ve come close.) Hey, just another reason to keep playing.

Gibson Smith, Duncan, S.C.

 

I have been a Strat player since 1964 and have never had a no-hitter to show for it. I have come close many times with pitchers such as Koufax, Gibson and Ryan. I think mostly it is due to the fact that I play short seasons of my leagues in C&D format. The best I could do was a Tom Seaver one-hitter with two outs in the ninth against the Pirates in my 1971 league. My favorite player, Roberto Clemente stroked a two-out double to the right field wall to break it up. Of course, I was managing the Pirates.

Alan L. Dehn, Schenectady, NY

 

In response to Scott from Ft. Lauderdale’s lack of a no-hitter: I have been an avid Strat card and dice gamer for over 20 years and have yet to toss a no-hitter. I have played over 2,000 games and once in 1987 Bert Blyleven of the Twins had one broken up by George Brett in the top of the 8th. Since then I haven’t gotten close. A couple of one-hitters with Randy Johnson in 1995 and 2001 but never late enough for drama. I also realize some of the best pitchers of all-time have never thrown one either. Keep rollin’.

             Joe Dorsa Flushing, NY

Speaking of Seaver, I once had him tossing a no-hitter through eight innings. But when he was up to bat in the bottom of the eighth, he was injured and couldn’t finish the game! At least all-time greats like Clemente and Brett broke up your no-hitters with clean hits. Though I’ve had many no-hitters in replays and draft-league play, I’ve had them broken up by a) a fielding-chart hit in the 9th against SS Craig Reynolds and b) a rare-play pop up that fell safely between infielders for the only safety.

 

No-Hitter Drought? Have You Pitched John Halama?

 

I have always read how people go decades without having a no-hitter. I experienced a no-hitter pretty quickly. Even though I just started when my dad bought the 2001 season, I only played the 2001 version minimally, so I started my first replay with the 2003 season. On April 24, John Halama of Oakland no-hit an injury-depleted Detroit Tigers team that lost 119 games during the regular season. The only base runner was Craig Monroe, who walked in the 5th inning. Oakland scored 13 runs in that game against Jeremy Bonderman.

 

Also, I recently started my own solitaire league. It has 16 teams, 2 leagues, one division per league. I drafted the teams using the Yahoo! Fantasy Sports rating system. Even though it was not perfect, and did not include retired players such as Brad Radke, it enabled me to draft non-biased. All teams drafted 50 players, though I never attempted to play the minor-league season. I play a 52-game schedule, including a mid-season All-Star Game which ended in extra innings with a Scott Spiezio two-run homer. I just finished about 3/4 of the season, but may need to wait until December to finish because I am just about to start school at UConn in the fall.

John Garcia, Oakdale, NY          

            Not taking your SOM league with you to college? That’s discipline. But it might be a wise move for the sake of your grades. I know plenty of Strat-O-Matic fanatics who play a series, then get to the homework. When it the series is so good that it leads to another, and another … well, you get the idea.